<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org">
<title>Clinical Cancer Research recent issues</title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org</link>
<description>Clinical Cancer Research RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1557-3265</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Clinical Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1078-0432</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/4997?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5000?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5022?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5033?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5043?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5061?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5069?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5090?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5099?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5150?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5173?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5236?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4685?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4694?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4735?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4743?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4780?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4809?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4814?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4821?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4843?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4850?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4869?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4877?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4908?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4925?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4943?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4951?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4971?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4981?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4989?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4995?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4372?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4385?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4417?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4446?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4463?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4517?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4526?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4532?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4543?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4556?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4564?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4640?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4650?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4658?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/14/4672?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4027?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4038?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4045?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4053?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4059?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4067?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4085?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4096?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4200?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4225?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4298?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4336?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4354?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/13/4355?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Clinical Cancer Research</title>
<url>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/4997?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targets of Tumor Immunity After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/4997?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The effectiveness of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies results from the donor immunity to antigens expressed in leukemia cells in the recipient. Similar immune responses have now been identified in patients with renal cell cancer with tumor regression after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Further studies to identify relevant antigens and mechanisms of resistance may improve the effectiveness of this approach in patients with solid tumors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ofran, Y., Ritz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0857</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targets of Tumor Immunity After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4999</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4997</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CCR Translations</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5000?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survivin: Key Regulator of Mitosis and Apoptosis and Novel Target for Cancer Therapeutics]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5000?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Survivin, a member of the family of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, functions as a key regulator of mitosis and programmed cell death. Initially, survivin was described as an inhibitor of caspase-9. However, over the last years, research studies have shown that the role of survivin in cancer pathogenesis is not limited to apoptosis inhibition but also involves the regulation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint and the promotion of angiogenesis and chemoresistance. Survivin gene expression is transcriptionally repressed by wild-type p53 and can be deregulated in cancer by several mechanisms, including gene amplification, hypomethylation, increased promoter activity, and loss of p53 function. This article reviews the multiple functions of survivin in the regulation of apoptosis, the promotion of tumorigenesis, and the development of survivin inhibitors as a novel anticancer therapeutic strategy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mita, A. C., Mita, M. M., Nawrocki, S. T., Giles, F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0746</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survivin: Key Regulator of Mitosis and Apoptosis and Novel Target for Cancer Therapeutics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5005</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5000</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Pathways</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical-Translational Approaches to the Nm23-H1 Metastasis Suppressor]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Nm23-H1 significantly reduces metastasis without effects on primary tumor size and was the first discovered metastasis suppressor gene. At least three mechanisms are thought to contribute to the metastasis-suppressive effect of Nm23-H1: (<I>a</I>) its histidine kinase activity toward ATP-citrate lyase, aldolase C, and the kinase suppressor of <I>ras</I>, with the last inactivating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling; (<I>b</I>) binding proteins that titer out "free" Nm23-H1 and inhibit its ability to suppress metastasis; and (<I>c</I>) altered gene expression downstream of Nm23-H1, particularly an inverse association with the lysophosphatidic acid receptor endothelial differentiation gene-28 (EDG2). Most metastasis suppressor genes, including Nm23-H1, affect metastatic colonization, which is the outgrowth of tumor cells in distant locations; therefore, they are of high translational interest. A phase II trial is ongoing to test the hypothesis that a compound, high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), used as an unconventional gluocorticoid, will stimulate breast cancer cells to reexpress Nm23-H1 and limit subsequent metastatic colonization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeg, P. S., Horak, C. E., Miller, K. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical-Translational Approaches to the Nm23-H1 Metastasis Suppressor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5012</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Pathways</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating Tumor Cells and Bone Marrow Micrometastasis]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sensitive immunocytochemical and molecular assays allow the detection of single circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the peripheral blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow as a common and easily accessible homing organ for cells released by epithelial tumors of various origins. The results obtained thus far have provided direct evidence that tumor cell dissemination starts already early during tumor development and progression. Tumor cells are frequently detected in the blood and bone marrow of cancer patients without clinical or even histopathologic signs of metastasis. The detection of DTC and CTC yields important prognostic information and might help to tailor systemic therapies to the individual needs of a cancer patient. In the present review, we provide a critical review of (<I>a</I>) the current methods used for detection of CTC/DTC and (<I>b</I>) data on the molecular characterization of CTC/DTC with a particular emphasis on tumor dormancy, cancer stem cell theory, and novel targets for biological therapies; and we pinpoint to (<I>c</I>) critical issues that need to be addressed to establish CTC/DTC measurements in clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alix-Panabieres, C., Riethdorf, S., Pantel, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Research, Clinical Research:  Imaging, Diagnosis, and Prognosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating Tumor Cells and Bone Marrow Micrometastasis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5021</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5022?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overexpression of Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 and Its Receptor CXCR4 Induces Autocrine/Paracrine Cell Proliferation in Human Pituitary Adenomas]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5022?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Hypothalamic or locally produced growth factors and cytokines control pituitary development, functioning, and cell division. We evaluated the expression of the chemokine stromal cell&ndash;derived factor 1 (SDF1) and its receptor CXCR4 in human pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissues and their role in cell proliferation.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The expression of SDF1 and CXCR4 in 65 human pituitary adenomas and 4 human normal pituitaries was determined by reverse transcription-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and confocal immunofluorescence. The proliferative effect of SDF1 was evaluated in eight fibroblast-free human pituitary adenoma cell cultures.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> CXCR4 mRNA was expressed in 92% of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHoma) and 81% of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), whereas SDF1 was identified in 63% and 78% of GHomas and NFPAs, respectively. Immunostaining for CXCR4 and SDF1 showed a strong homogenous labeling in all tumoral cells in both GHomas and NFPAs. In normal tissues, CXCR4 and SDF1 were expressed only in a subset of anterior pituitary cells, with a lower expression of SDF1 compared with its cognate receptor. CXCR4 and SDF1 were not confined to a specific cell population in the anterior pituitary but colocalized with discrete subpopulations of GH-, prolactin-, and adrenocorticorticotropic hormone&ndash;secreting cells. Conversely, most of the SDF1-containing cells expressed CXCR4. In six of eight pituitary adenoma primary cultures, SDF1 induced a statistically significant increase in DNA synthesis that was prevented by the treatment with the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 or somatostatin.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> CXCR4 and SDF1 are overexpressed in human pituitary adenomas and CXCR4 activation may contribute to pituitary cell proliferation and, possibly, to adenoma development `in humans.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbieri, F., Bajetto, A., Stumm, R., Pattarozzi, A., Porcile, C., Zona, G., Dorcaratto, A., Ravetti, J.-L., Minuto, F., Spaziante, R., Schettini, G., Ferone, D., Florio, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4717</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overexpression of Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 and Its Receptor CXCR4 Induces Autocrine/Paracrine Cell Proliferation in Human Pituitary Adenomas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5032</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5022</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Human Cancer Biology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5033?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Midkine Enhances Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Growth: A Possible Novel Therapeutic Target]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5033?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> New therapeutic targets for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are critically needed. Midkine (MK), a multifunctional cytokine, is expressed during midgestation but is highly restricted in normal adult tissues. Renewed MK expression was shown in several malignancies where protumorigenic properties were described. We evaluated the expression and function of MK in STS.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription-PCR, and Western blotting (WB) evaluated MK expression in human STS tissues and cell lines. WB and flow cytometry analyzed MK receptor expression. Cell growth assays evaluated the effect of MK on STS cell growth, and WB assessed MK downstream signaling. MK knock-in and knockout experiments further evaluated MK function. The growth of parental versus MK-transfected human fibrosarcoma cells was studied <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> MK was found to be overexpressed in a variety of human STS histologies. Using a rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) tissue microarray, cytoplasmic and nuclear MK was identified; nuclear MK expression was significantly increased in metastases. Similarly, several STS cell lines expressed and secreted MK; RMS cells exhibited nuclear MK. STS cells also expressed the MK receptors protein tyrosine phosphatase  and lipoprotein receptor-related protein. MK significantly enhanced STS cell growth potentially via the Src and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathways. STS cells stably transfected with MK exhibited increased growth <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I>. MK-expressing human STS xenografts showed increased tumor-associated vasculature. Furthermore, MK knockdown resulted in decreased STS cell growth, especially in RMS cells.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> MK enhances STS tumor growth; our results support further investigation of MK and its receptors as therapeutic targets for human STS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jin, Z., Lahat, G., Korchin, B., Nguyen, T., Zhu, Q.-S., Wang, X., Lazar, A. J., Trent, J., Pollock, R. E., Lev, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Midkine Enhances Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Growth: A Possible Novel Therapeutic Target]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5042</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5033</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Human Cancer Biology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5043?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High Expression of Neuropeptide Y1 Receptors in Ewing Sarcoma Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5043?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Peptide receptors are frequently overexpressed in human tumors, allowing receptor-targeted scintigraphic imaging and therapy with radiolabeled peptide analogues. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors are new candidates for these applications, based on their high expression in specific cancers. Because NPY receptors are expressed in selected sarcoma cell lines and because novel treatment options are needed for sarcomas, this study assessed the NPY receptor in primary human sarcomas.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Tumor tissues of 88 cases, including Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), synovial sarcomas, osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, liposarcomas, angiosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, and desmoid tumors, were investigated for NPY receptor protein with <I>in vitro</I> receptor autoradiography using <sup>125</sup>I-labeled NPY receptor ligands and for NPY receptor mRNA expression with <I>in situ</I> hybridization.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> ESFT expressed the NPY receptor subtype Y1 on tumor cells in remarkably high incidence (84%) and density (mean, 5,314 dpm/mg tissue). Likewise, synovial sarcomas expressed Y1 on tumor cells in high density (mean, 7,497 dpm/mg; incidence, 40%). The remaining tumors expressed NPY receptor subtypes Y1 or Y2 at lower levels. Moreover, many of the sarcomas showed Y1 expression on intratumoral blood vessels. <I>In situ</I> hybridization for Y1 mRNA confirmed the autoradiography results.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> NPY receptors are novel molecular markers for human sarcomas. Y1 may inhibit growth of specific sarcomas, as previously shown in an <I>in vivo</I> mouse model of human ESFT. The high Y1 expression on tumor cells of ESFT and synovial sarcomas and on blood vessels in many other sarcomas represents an attractive basis for an <I>in vivo</I> tumor targeting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Korner, M., Waser, B., Reubi, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4551</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High Expression of Neuropeptide Y1 Receptors in Ewing Sarcoma Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5049</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5043</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Human Cancer Biology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonredundant Functions for Tumor Protein D52-Like Proteins Support Specific Targeting of TPD52]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> <I>Tumor protein D52</I> (<I>TPD52</I> or <I>D52</I>) is frequently overexpressed in breast and other cancers and present at increased gene copy number. It is, however, unclear whether <I>D52</I> amplification and overexpression target specific functional properties of the encoded protein.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The expression of <I>D52</I>-like genes and <I>MAL2</I> was compared in breast tissues using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. The functions of human <I>D52</I> and <I>D53</I> genes were then compared by stable expression in BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts and transient gene knockdown in breast carcinoma cell lines. <I>In situ</I> D52 and MAL2 protein expression was analyzed in breast tissue samples using tissue microarray sections.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The <I>D52</I> (8q21.13), <I>D54</I> (20q13.33), and <I>MAL2</I> (8q24.12) genes were significantly overexpressed in breast cancer tissue (<I>n</I> = 95) relative to normal breast (<I>n</I> = 7; <I>P</I> &le; 0.005) unlike the <I>D53</I> gene (6q22.31; <I>P</I> = 0.884). Subsequently, D52-expressing but not D53-expressing 3T3 cell lines showed increased proliferation and anchorage-independent growth capacity, and reduced D52 but not D53 expression in SK-BR-3 cells significantly increased apoptosis. High D52 but not MAL2 expression was significantly associated with reduced overall survival in breast carcinoma patients (log-rank test, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001; <I>n</I> = 357) and was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 2.274; 95% confidence interval, 1.228-4.210; <I>P</I> = 0.009; <I>n</I> = 328).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> D52 overexpression in cancer reflects specific targeting and may contribute to a more proliferative, aggressive tumor phenotype in breast cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shehata, M., Bieche, I., Boutros, R., Weidenhofer, J., Fanayan, S., Spalding, L., Zeps, N., Byth, K., Bright, R. K., Lidereau, R., Byrne, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4994</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonredundant Functions for Tumor Protein D52-Like Proteins Support Specific Targeting of TPD52]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5060</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Human Cancer Biology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5061?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COOH-Terminal Truncated HBV X Protein Plays Key Role in Hepatocarcinogenesis]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5061?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> X protein (HBx), a product of hepatitis B virus, has been closely associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on observations that the COOH-terminal truncated HBx was frequently detected in HCC, the aim of this study is to evaluate the function of COOH-terminal truncated HBx in hepatocarcinogenesis.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Expression pattern of HBx was analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray containing 194 pairs of HCCs and their matched nontumor liver tissues. MIHA and HepG2 cells transfected with full-length (X2) and COOH-terminal truncated HBx (X1) were tested for their ability to grow in soft agar and form tumors <I>in vivo</I>. Proliferation and apoptosis were assessed using 2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt and terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assays, respectively. To gain additional insight, the expression profile of HepG2-X2 and HepG2-X1 were compared using cDNA microarray.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> COOH-terminal truncated HBx was frequently detected in HCCs (79.3%, <I>n</I> = 111), and our <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I> studies showed that the truncated rather than the full-length HBx could effectively transform immortalized liver cell line MIHA. Interestingly, expression profiling revealed differential expression of key genes implicated in the control of cell cycle and apoptosis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings strongly suggest that the COOH-terminal truncated HBx plays a critical role in the HCC carcinogenesis via the activation of cell proliferation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, N.-F., Lau, S. H., Hu, L., Xie, D., Wu, J., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Wu, M.-C., Fung, J., Bai, X., Tzang, C.-H., Fu, L., Yang, M., Su, Y. A., Guan, X.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COOH-Terminal Truncated HBV X Protein Plays Key Role in Hepatocarcinogenesis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5068</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5061</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Human Cancer Biology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5069?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 Contributes to Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Drugs in Human Cancer Cells]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5069?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The resistance to selective EGFR inhibitors involves the activation of alternative signaling pathways, and Akt activation and VEGF induction have been described in EGFR inhibitor&ndash;resistant tumors. Combined inhibition of EGFR and other signaling proteins has become a successful therapeutic approach, stimulating the search for further determinants of resistance as basis for novel therapeutic strategies.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We established human cancer cell lines with various degrees of EGFR expression and sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors and analyzed signal transducers under the control of EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent pathways.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Multitargeted inhibitor vandetanib (ZD6474) inhibited the growth and the phosphorylation of Akt and its effector p70S6 kinase in both wild-type and EGFR inhibitor&ndash;resistant human colon, prostate, and breast cancer cells. We found that the resistant cell lines exhibit, as common feature, VEGFR-1/Flt-1 overexpression, increased secretion of VEGF and placental growth factor, and augmented migration capabilities and that vandetanib is able to antagonize them. Accordingly, a new kinase assay revealed that in addition to VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2, RET, and EGFR, vandetanib efficiently inhibits also VEGFR-1. The contribution of VEGFR-1 to the resistant phenotype was further supported by the demonstration that VEGFR-1 silencing in resistant cells restored sensitivity to anti-EGFR drugs and impaired migration capabilities, whereas exogenous VEGFR-1 overexpression in wild-type cells conferred resistance to these agents.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study shows that VEGFR-1 contributes to anti-EGFR drug resistance in different human cancer cells. Moreover, vandetanib inhibits VEGFR-1 activation, cell proliferation, and migration, suggesting its potential utility in patients resistant to EGFR inhibitors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bianco, R., Rosa, R., Damiano, V., Daniele, G., Gelardi, T., Garofalo, S., Tarallo, V., De Falco, S., Melisi, D., Benelli, R., Albini, A., Ryan, A., Ciardiello, F., Tortora, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4905</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 Contributes to Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Drugs in Human Cancer Cells]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5080</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5069</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vandetanib Inhibits Growth of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in an Orthotopic Nude Mouse Model]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) can often be controlled with surgery and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy but is also characterized by late local recurrence and distant metastasis. No effective systemic therapeutic agents have been found to alter the natural history of ACC. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are needed. In this study, we evaluated whether vandetanib (Zactima), a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinases, had antitumor efficacy <I>in vitro</I> and in an orthotopic nude mouse model of human ACC.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The <I>in vitro</I> effects of vandetanib were assessed in three ACC cell lines on cell growth, apoptosis, and VEGFR-2 and EGFR phosphorylation levels. The <I>in vivo</I> antitumor activity of vandetanib was examined in nude mice bearing parotid gland ACC tumors. The mice were treated for 4 weeks with vandetanib (50 mg/kg/d) or placebo (control). Tumors were resected at necropsy, and immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining were done.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> <I>In vitro</I>, vandetanib caused dose-dependent inhibition of VEGFR-2 and EGFR phosphorylation in ACC cells. Vandetanib also inhibited the cell proliferation and induced their dose-dependent apoptosis. <I>In vivo</I>, mice in the vandetanib group had tumor volumes significantly lower than those in the control group (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). In addition, immunohistochemical staining showed a decrease in microvessel density and an increase in apoptosis of both tumor cells and endothelial cells within the tumor xenografts.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> These results suggest that vandetanib inhibits the growth of ACC <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I>, making it a promising novel agent for the treatment of ACC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, S., Sano, D., Cheung, M., Zhao, M., Jasser, S. A., Ryan, A. J., Mao, L., Chen, W.-T., El-Naggar, A. K., Myers, J. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0245</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vandetanib Inhibits Growth of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in an Orthotopic Nude Mouse Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5089</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5090?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perifosine Synergistically Enhances TRAIL-Induced Myeloma Cell Apoptosis via Up-Regulation of Death Receptors]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5090?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a novel Akt inhibitor, perifosine, in combination with tumor necrosis factor&ndash;related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in human myeloma cells and primary patient samples.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The activity of perifosine in combination with TRAIL was evaluated with experiments testing the effect of perifosine on DR4/DR5 expression by the use of chimeric blocking antibodies, as well as siRNA.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> DR4 and DR5 expression was induced by exposure to single-agent perifosine. After exposure of human myeloma cell lines or primary patient samples to increasing doses of perifosine with exogenous TRAIL, we identified synergistically enhanced apoptosis when compared with the perifosine alone, which was achieved with levels well below clinically achievable concentrations for both agents. Transfection with siRNA against DR4, and DR5 reduced the level of apoptosis induced by the combination but did not result in total abrogation of the combination effect. Overexpression of activated Akt, the proposed target for perifosine, did not inhibit the combination effect. Anti-DR4 and DR5 chimeric proteins blocked the cytotoxicity induced by the combination, and the use of c-FLICE-like interleukin protein (FLIP) siRNA enhanced the efficacy at the combination, further supporting the importance of the DR4/DR5 axis in the effect of perifosine.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our observation seems to be independent of the effects of perifosine on Akt signaling, and may represent an additional mechanism of action for this agent, and supports future clinical trials combining these two agents.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David, E., Sinha, R., Chen, J., Sun, S.-Y., Kaufman, J. L., Lonial, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perifosine Synergistically Enhances TRAIL-Induced Myeloma Cell Apoptosis via Up-Regulation of Death Receptors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5098</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5090</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5099?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhanced Antitumor Therapy by Inhibition of p21waf1 in Human Malignant Mesothelioma]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5099?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor was frequently expressed in human malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tissues as well as cell lines. Recent data indicate that p21 keeps tumor cells alive after DNA damage, favoring a survival advantage. In this study, we assessed the possibility of p21 suppression as a therapeutic target for MPM.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We established two different MPM-derived (from H28 and H2052 cells) subclones using vector-based short hairpin RNA (shRNA). Then, chemosensitivity against low doses of antineoplastic DNA-damaging agents was investigated by colony formation assays, and furthermore, the type of cell response induced by these drugs was analyzed. To examine the effect of p21 shRNA on chemosensitivity <I>in vivo</I>, tumor formation assays in nude mice were done.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In colony formation assay, the IC<SUB>50</SUB> of doxorubicin was 33 &plusmn; 3.0 nmol/L in p21 shRNA-transfected cells with respect to 125 &plusmn; 10 nmol/L of control vector&ndash;transfected cells. This enhancement of growth inhibition was achieved by converting a senescence-like growth arrest to apoptosis in response to doxorubicin, etoposide, and CPT11. In the <I>in vivo</I> assays, CPT11 and loss-of-expression of p21 in combination led to considerable suppression of tumor growth associated with a substantially enhanced apoptotic response, whereas CPT11 alone was ineffective at inducing these responses.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These results indicated that p21 might play an important role in chemosensitivity to anticancer agents, and the suppression of its expression might be a potential therapeutic target for MPM.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazzarini, R., Moretti, S., Orecchia, S., Betta, P.-G., Procopio, A., Catalano, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0255</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhanced Antitumor Therapy by Inhibition of p21waf1 in Human Malignant Mesothelioma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5099</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimodality Therapy: Potentiation of High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation with Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Disseminated Peritoneal Disease]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Studies herein explore paclitaxel enhancement of the therapeutic efficacy of -particle-targeted radiation therapy.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Athymic mice bearing 3 day i.p. LS-174T xenografts were treated with 300 or 600 &micro;g paclitaxel at 24 h before, concurrently, or 24 h after [<sup>213</sup>Bi] or [<sup>212</sup>Pb]trastuzumab.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Paclitaxel (300 or 600 &micro;g) followed 24 h later with [<sup>213</sup>Bi]trastuzumab (500 &micro;Ci) provided no therapeutic enhancement. Paclitaxel (300 &micro;g) administered concurrently with [<sup>213</sup>Bi]trastuzumab or [<sup>213</sup>Bi]HuIgG resulted in median survival of 93 and 37 days, respectively; no difference was observed with 600 &micro;g paclitaxel. Mice receiving just [<sup>213</sup>Bi]trastuzumab or [<sup>213</sup>Bi]HuIgG or left untreated had a median survival of 31, 21, and 15 days, respectively, 23 days for just either paclitaxel dose alone. Paclitaxel (300 or 600 &micro;g) given 24 h after [<sup>213</sup>Bi]trastuzumab increased median survival to 100 and 135 days, respectively. The greatest improvement in median survival (198 days) was obtained with two weekly doses of paclitaxel (600 &micro;g) followed by [<sup>213</sup>Bi]trastuzumab. Studies were also conducted investigating paclitaxel administered 24 h before, concurrently, or 24 h after [<sup>212</sup>Pb]trastuzumab (10 &micro;Ci). The 300 &micro;g paclitaxel 24 h before radioimmunotherapy (RIT) failed to provide benefit, whereas 600 &micro;g extended the median survival from 44 to 171 days.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that regimens combining chemotherapeutics and high linear energy transfer (LET) RIT may have tremendous potential in the management and treatment of cancer patients. Dose dependency and administration order appear to be critical factors requiring careful investigation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milenic, D. E., Garmestani, K., Brady, E. D., Baidoo, K. E., Albert, P. S., Wong, K. J., Flynn, J., Brechbiel, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimodality Therapy: Potentiation of High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation with Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Disseminated Peritoneal Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5115</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proteasome Inhibition Activates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and EGFR-Independent Mitogenic Kinase Signaling Pathways in Pancreatic Cancer Cells]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> In the current study, we investigate the activation of antiapoptotic signaling pathways in response to proteasome inhibitor treatment in pancreatic cancer and evaluate the use of concomitant inhibition of these pathways to augment proteasome inhibitor treatment responses.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Pancreatic cancer cell lines and mouse flank xenografts were treated with proteasome inhibitor alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic compounds (gemcitabine, erlotinib, and bevacizumab), induction of apoptosis and effects on tumor growth were assessed. The effect of bortezomib (a first-generation proteasome inhibitor) and NPI-0052 (a second-generation proteasome inhibitor) treatment on key pancreatic mitogenic and antiapoptotic pathways [epidermal growth factor receptor, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT] was determined and the ability of inhibitors of these pathways to enhance the effects of proteasome inhibition was assessed <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Our data showed that proteasome inhibitor treatment activates antiapoptotic and mitogenic signaling pathways (epidermal growth factor receptor, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, c-<I>Jun</I>-NH<SUB>2</SUB>-kinase, and PI3K/AKT) in pancreatic cancer. Additionally, we found that activation of these pathways impairs tumor response to proteasome inhibitor treatment and inhibition of the c-<I>Jun</I>-NH<SUB>2</SUB>-kinase and PI3K/AKT pathways increases the antitumor effects of proteasome inhibitor treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> These preclinical studies suggest that targeting proteasome inhibitor&ndash;induced antiapoptotic signaling pathways in combination with proteasome inhibition may augment treatment response in highly resistant solid organ malignancies. Further evaluation of these novel treatment combinations in clinical trials is warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloss, C. M., Wang, F., Liu, R., Xia, L., Houston, M., Ljungman, D., Palladino, M. A., Cusack, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4506</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proteasome Inhibition Activates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and EGFR-Independent Mitogenic Kinase Signaling Pathways in Pancreatic Cancer Cells]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Rapamycin Alone and in Combination with Sorafenib in an Orthotopic Model of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Novel therapeutic strategies are needed to prevent the tumor recurrence or metastasis after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was to investigate the effect of rapamycin, alone and in combination with sorafenib, on HCC <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Xenograft of a highly metastatic human HCC tumor (LCI-D20) was used to evaluate primary tumor growth and lung metastasis after treatment with rapamycin alone or in combination with sorafenib. Tumor cell proliferation was determined by Ki-67 immunostaining. To detect tumor cell apoptosis, the terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase&ndash;mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay was used. Tumor angiogenesis was investigated by using a monoclonal anti-CD31 antibody. A vascular endothelial growth factor ELISA kit was used to measure vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels in the mice serum.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Rapamycin, alone and in combination with sorafenib, strongly inhibited primary tumor growth and lung metastases in LCI-D20 model. Furthermore, the combination therapy significantly enhanced the effect of antitumor on primary tumor growth compared with single treatment with either rapamycin (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) or sorafenib (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Rapamycin alone inhibited HCC cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and decreased tumor angiogenesis. Nevertheless, the combination therapy showed a significant inhibition of tumor cell proliferation (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, the combination therapy also further enhanced suppression of tumor cell angiogenesis compared with rapamycin treatment (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). However, the induction of apoptosis in combination therapy group was not significantly higher than in the rapamycin-treated group (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.05).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The combination therapy of rapamycin and sorafenib could be a new and promising therapeutic approach to the treatment of HCC and prevention of HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Z., Zhou, J., Fan, J., Qiu, S.-J., Yu, Y., Huang, X.-W., Tang, Z.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4774</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Rapamycin Alone and in Combination with Sorafenib in an Orthotopic Model of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Checkpoint Kinase 1 Down-Regulation by an Inducible Small Interfering RNA Expression System Sensitized In vivo Tumors to Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> After DNA damage, checkpoints pathways are activated in the cells to halt the cell cycle, thus ensuring repair or inducing cell death. To better investigate the role of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in cellular response to different anticancer agents, Chk1 was knocked down in HCT-116 cell line and in its p53-deficient subline by using small interfering RNAs (siRNA).</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Chk1 was abrogated by transient transfection of specific siRNA against it, and stable tetracycline-inducible Chk1 siRNA clones were obtained transfecting cells with a plasmid expressing two siRNA against Chk1. The validated inducible system was then translated in an <I>in vivo</I> setting by transplanting the inducible clones in nude mice.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Transient Chk1 down-regulation sensitized HCT-116 cells, p53<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup> more than the p53 wild-type counterpart, to DNA-damaging agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and etoposide treatments, with no modification of Taxol and PS341 cytotoxic activities. Inhibition of Chk1 protein levels in inducible clones on induction with doxycycline correlated with an increased cisplatin and 5-FU activity. Such effect was more evident in a p53-deficient background. These clones were transplanted in nude mice and a clear Chk1 down-regulation was shown in tumor samples of mice given tetracycline in the drinking water by immunohistochemical detection of Chk1 protein. More importantly, an increased 5-FU antitumor activity was found in tumors with the double Chk1 and p53 silencing.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings corroborate the fact that Chk1 protein is a molecular target to be inhibited in tumors with a defective G<SUB>1</SUB> checkpoint to increase the selectivity of anticancer treatments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ganzinelli, M., Carrassa, L., Crippa, F., Tavecchio, M., Broggini, M., Damia, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Checkpoint Kinase 1 Down-Regulation by an Inducible Small Interfering RNA Expression System Sensitized In vivo Tumors to Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors with Gemcitabine and Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Gemcitabine-radiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical data have shown that gemcitabine plus erlotinib is superior to gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with gemcitabine and radiation on a pancreatic cancer model.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> EGFR signaling was analyzed by measuring phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR<sup>(Y845), (Y1173)</sup>) and AKT (pAKT<sup>(S473)</sup>) protein levels in pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumors. The effects of scheduling on gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization combined with erlotinib were determined by clonogenic survival. <I>In vivo</I>, the effects of cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation on the growth of BxPC-3 tumor xenografts were measured.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We found <I>in vitro</I> that gemcitabine induced phosphorylation of EGFR at Y845 and Y1173 that was blocked by erlotinib. Treatment of BxPC-3 cells with gemcitabine before erlotinib enhanced gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity without abrogating radiosensitization. <I>In vivo</I>, cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation inhibited growth compared with gemcitabine-radiation (time to tumor doubling: gemcitabine + radiation, 19 &plusmn; 3 days; cetuximab + gemcitabine + radiation, 30 &plusmn; 3 days; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05, erlotinib + gemcitabine + radiation 28 &plusmn; 3 days; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.1). Cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation resulted in significant inhibition of pEGFR<sup>(Y1173)</sup> and pAKT<sup>(S473)</sup> early in treatment, and pEGFR<sup>(Y845)</sup>, pEGFR<sup>(Y1173)</sup>, and pAKT<sup>(S473)</sup> by the end of treatment. This study shows a novel difference pEGFR<sup>(Y845)</sup> and pEGFR<sup>(Y1173)</sup> in response to EGFR inhibition.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These results show that the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and erlotinib increase the efficacy of gemcitabine-radiation. This work supports the integration of EGFR inhibitors with gemcitabine-radiation in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, M. A., Parsels, L. A., Kollar, L. E., Normolle, D. P., Maybaum, J., Lawrence, T. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors with Gemcitabine and Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Preclinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5150?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tumor Cell and Tumor Vasculature Expression of B7-H3 Predict Survival in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5150?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Although the prognostic value of B7-H1 and B7-H4 expression by tumor cells in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has been established, the role of B7-H3 is unknown. As such, we evaluated the association of B7-H3 expression with clinicopathologic outcomes in patients treated for ccRCC.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Nephrectomy specimens from 743 consecutive patients treated for ccRCC at our institution from 1990 to 1999 were evaluated for B7-H3 expression by immunohistochemical staining. Associations of B7-H3 expression with clinical and pathologic features were evaluated using <sup>2</sup> and Fisher's exact tests. Associations of B7-H3 expression with death from RCC were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> B7-H3 expression by tumor cells or tumor vasculature was noted in 17% and 95% of specimens, respectively. The presence of either tumor cell or diffuse tumor vasculature expression of B7-H3 was present in 46% of specimens and was associated with multiple adverse clinical and pathologic features. After multivariable adjustment, the presence of either tumor cell or diffuse tumor vasculature B7-H3 expression was significantly associated with an increased risk of death from RCC (risk ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.84; <I>P</I> = 0.029).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both tumor cell and tumor vasculature B7-H3 expression convey important information to predict ccRCC outcomes. Collectively, our past and present studies pertaining to B7-H ligand expression indicate that ccRCC may use redundant mechanisms to compromise host antitumoral immunity. Future studies will focus on the effect of combined B7-H ligand expression in RCC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crispen, P. L., Sheinin, Y., Roth, T. J., Lohse, C. M., Kuntz, S. M., Frigola, X., Thompson, R. H., Boorjian, S. A., Dong, H., Leibovich, B. C., Blute, M. L., Kwon, E. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0536</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tumor Cell and Tumor Vasculature Expression of B7-H3 Predict Survival in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Recently, several prognostic gene expression signatures have been identified; however, their performance has never been evaluated according to the previously described molecular subtypes based on the estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and their biological meaning has remained unclear. Here we aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis integrating both clinicopathologic and gene expression data, focusing on the main molecular subtypes.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We developed gene expression modules related to key biological processes in breast cancer such as tumor invasion, immune response, angiogenesis, apoptosis, proliferation, and ER and HER2 signaling, and then analyzed these modules together with clinical variables and several prognostic signatures on publicly available microarray studies (&gt;2,100 patients).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Multivariate analysis showed that in the ER+/HER2&ndash; subgroup, only the proliferation module and the histologic grade were significantly associated with clinical outcome. In the ER&ndash;/HER2&ndash; subgroup, only the immune response module was associated with prognosis, whereas in the HER2+ tumors, the tumor invasion and immune response modules displayed significant association with survival. Proliferation was identified as the most important component of several prognostic signatures, and their performance was limited to the ER+/HER2&ndash; subgroup.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Although proliferation is the strongest parameter predicting clinical outcome in the ER+/HER2&ndash; subtype and the common denominator of most prognostic gene signatures, immune response and tumor invasion seem to be the main molecular processes associated with prognosis in the ER&ndash;/HER2&ndash; and HER2+ subgroups, respectively. These findings may help to define new clinicogenomic models and to identify new therapeutic strategies in the specific molecular subgroups.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desmedt, C., Haibe-Kains, B., Wirapati, P., Buyse, M., Larsimont, D., Bontempi, G., Delorenzi, M., Piccart, M., Sotiriou, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4756</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and Prognostic Impact of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Human Gliomas]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The incidence of regulatory T cells (Treg) in intrinsic central nervous system malignancies is unknown. Immunotherapeutic approaches that inhibit the Treg population may be limited to a subset of patients with gliomas. Our hypothesis is that only the most malignant gliomas have a prominent glioma-infiltrating Treg population that contributes to the immunosuppressive biology and that the presence of Tregs is a negative prognostic variable.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We measured the incidence of Tregs in 135 glial tumors (including all pathologic types) in a glioma microarray using immunohistochemical analysis. Results were categorized according to the total number of Tregs within the tumors. Correlation of the presence of Tregs with prognosis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Tregs were not present in normal brain tissue and were very rarely found in low-grade gliomas and oligodendrogliomas. We observed significant differences in the prevalence of Tregs between astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors, between tumors of different grades, and between different pathologic types of tumors. We identified Tregs most frequently in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) but very rarely in low-grade astrocytomas. The presence of Tregs within GBMs did not alter the median survival in patients from whom the tumors were obtained.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Treg infiltration differed significantly in the tumors according to lineage, pathology, and grade. Tregs seemed to have the highest predilection for tumors of the astrocytic lineage and specifically in the high-grade gliomas, such as GBM. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, the presence of Tregs in GBMs seemed to be prognostically neutral.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heimberger, A. B., Abou-Ghazal, M., Reina-Ortiz, C., Yang, D. S., Sun, W., Qiao, W., Hiraoka, N., Fuller, G. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0320</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and Prognostic Impact of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Human Gliomas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5172</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5173?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting Clinical Outcome through Molecular Profiling in Stage III Melanoma]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5173?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma represent a heterogeneous cohort with average 5-year overall survival rates of &lt;30%. With current algorithms, it is not possible to predict which patients will achieve longer-term survival. We hypothesized that molecular profiling could be used to identify prognostic groups within patients with stage III melanoma while also providing a greater understanding of the biological programs underpinning these differences.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Lymph node sections from 29 patients with stage IIIB and IIIC melanoma, with divergent clinical outcome including 16 "poor-prognosis" and 13 "good-prognosis" patients as defined by time to tumor progression, were subjected to molecular profiling using oligonucleotide arrays as an initial training set. Twenty-one differentially expressed genes were validated using quantitative PCR and the 15 genes with strongest cross-platform correlation were used to develop two predictive scores, which were applied to two independent validation sets of 10 and 14 stage III tumor samples.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Supervised analysis using differentially expressed genes was able to differentiate the prognostic groups in the training set. The developed predictive scores correlated directly with clinical outcome. When the predictive scores were applied to the two independent validation sets, clinical outcome was accurately predicted in 90% and 85% of patients, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> We describe a gene expression profile that is capable of distinguishing clinical outcomes in a previously homogeneous group of stage III melanoma patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John, T., Black, M. A., Toro, T. T., Leader, D., Gedye, C. A., Davis, I. D., Guilford, P. J., Cebon, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting Clinical Outcome through Molecular Profiling in Stage III Melanoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deletion of 1p32-p36 Is the Most Frequent Genetic Change and Poor Prognostic Marker in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Salivary Glands]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5181?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a relatively uncommon salivary gland malignancy known for its protean phenotypic features and pernicious clinical behavior. Currently, no effective therapy is available for patients with advanced nonresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic disease. The purpose of this study is to identify prognostic factors other than tumor stage that can be used to predict the outcome of the patients with ACC.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to identify copy number aberrations in 53 primary ACCs. Array CGH and fluorescence <I>in situ</I> hybridization analysis was used to validate CGH results on selected cases. We correlated these copy number aberrations with clinicopathologic factors using Pearson's <sup>2</sup> or by the two-tailed Fisher exact test. The disease-specific survival and disease-free intervals were generated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Chromosomal losses (<I>n</I> = 134) were more frequent than gains (<I>n</I> = 74). The most frequent genetic change was the loss of 1p32-p36 in 44% of the cases followed by 6q23-q27, and 12q12-q14. The most frequently gained chromosomal regions were 8 and 18. Of the chromosomal aberrations, loss of 1p32-p36 was the only abnormality significantly associated with patient's outcome.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study, for the first time, identifies loss of 1p32-p36 as a significant aberration in ACC. Molecular characterization of 1p32-36 region using the available genomic technologies may lead to the identification of new genes critical to the development of novel therapeutic targets for this disease copy number aberration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rao, P. H., Roberts, D., Zhao, Y.-J., Bell, D., Harris, C. P., Weber, R. S., El-Naggar, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deletion of 1p32-p36 Is the Most Frequent Genetic Change and Poor Prognostic Marker in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Salivary Glands]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HER3 Is a Determinant for Poor Prognosis in Melanoma]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The epidermal growth factor receptor family member HER3 is overexpressed in diverse human cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer. However, the relevance of HER3 with regard to its prognostic significance and function in primary melanoma and metastases remains largely elusive.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> HER3 protein expression was analyzed immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays of 130 primary melanoma and 87 metastases relative to established clinical variables. The possibility of an influence of HER3 on melanoma cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and chemotherapy-induced apoptosis was studied in human melanoma cell lines.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We show that HER3 is frequently expressed in malignant melanoma and metastases at elevated levels. High HER3 expression may serve as a prognostic marker because it correlates with cell proliferation, tumor progression, and reduced patient survival. Suppression of <I>HER3</I> expression by RNA interference reduces melanoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion <I>in vitro</I>. In addition, down-regulation of <I>HER3</I> synergistically enhances dacarbazine-induced apoptosis. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies specific for the extracellular portion of HER3 efficiently block heregulin-induced proliferation, migration, and invasion of melanoma cell lines.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our results provide novel insights into the role of HER3 in melanoma and point out new possibilities for therapeutic intervention.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reschke, M., Mihic-Probst, D., van der Horst, E. H., Knyazev, P., Wild, P. J., Hutterer, M., Meyer, S., Dummer, R., Moch, H., Ullrich, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0186</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HER3 Is a Determinant for Poor Prognosis in Melanoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Novel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The study aim to identify novel molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer by gene expression profiling with linkage to clinical and pathologic features.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Microarray gene expression profiling was done on 285 serous and endometrioid tumors of the ovary, peritoneum, and fallopian tube. <I>K</I>-means clustering was applied to identify robust molecular subtypes. Statistical analysis identified differentially expressed genes, pathways, and gene ontologies. Laser capture microdissection, pathology review, and immunohistochemistry validated the array-based findings. Patient survival within <I>k</I>-means groups was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Class prediction validated <I>k</I>-means groups in an independent dataset. A semisupervised survival analysis of the array data was used to compare against unsupervised clustering results.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Optimal clustering of array data identified six molecular subtypes. Two subtypes represented predominantly serous low malignant potential and low-grade endometrioid subtypes, respectively. The remaining four subtypes represented higher grade and advanced stage cancers of serous and endometrioid morphology. A novel subtype of high-grade serous cancers reflected a mesenchymal cell type, characterized by overexpression of <I>N-cadherin</I> and <I>P-cadherin</I> and low expression of differentiation markers, including CA125 and MUC1. A poor prognosis subtype was defined by a reactive stroma gene expression signature, correlating with extensive desmoplasia in such samples. A similar poor prognosis signature could be found using a semisupervised analysis. Each subtype displayed distinct levels and patterns of immune cell infiltration. Class prediction identified similar subtypes in an independent ovarian dataset with similar prognostic trends.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Gene expression profiling identified molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer of biological and clinical importance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tothill, R. W., Tinker, A. V., George, J., Brown, R., Fox, S. B., Lade, S., Johnson, D. S., Trivett, M. K., Etemadmoghadam, D., Locandro, B., Traficante, N., Fereday, S., Hung, J. A., Chiew, Y.-E., Haviv, I., Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Gertig, D., deFazio, A., Bowtell, D. D.L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Novel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gefitinib Induction of In vivo Detectable Signals by Bcl-2/Bcl-xL Modulation of Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor Type 3]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> To test whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) induce detectable signals in tumor cells and whether such signals may reveal alterations of the apoptotic program.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Tumor cells were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib and tested for their ability to accumulate 99mTc-Sestamibi, a radiolabeled lipophilic cation that localizes in mitochondria. Then we tested whether Bcl-2 and Bcl-x<SUB>L</SUB> alter the pattern of drug-dependent tracer accumulation while reducing tumor cell sensitivity to EGFR TKIs. The mechanism underlying the pattern of tracer accumulation was elucidated. Finally, imaging studies were done in animal models and lung cancer patients before and after treatment with EGFR TKIs using single-photon emission computed tomography and 99mTc-Sestamibi.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Gefitinib increases accumulation of 99mTc-Sestamibi in Bcl-2&ndash;overexpressing cells and enhances the physical interaction of phosphorylated Bcl-2 with inositol trisphosphate receptor type 3 (IP3R3). Consequently, a relative increase of cytosolic and mitochondrial calcium levels occurs. Similarly, lung cancer cells showed an increase of tracer uptake and an enhanced interaction of Bcl-x<SUB>L</SUB> with IP3R3 on exposure to erlotinib concentrations achievable in plasma. The occurrence of these interactions was associated with an enhanced EGFR TKI&ndash;induced apoptosis resistance. Posttreatment imaging studies in nude mice bearing control and Bcl-2&ndash;overexpressing breast carcinomas showed a high tumor uptake of the tracer whereas baseline studies failed to visualize tumors. Similarly, an enhancement of tracer uptake could be detected in patients with lung cancer treated with erlotinib.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> EGFR TKIs generate detectable signals by Bcl-2/Bcl-x<SUB>L</SUB> modulation of IP3R3 in tumor cells.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zannetti, A., Iommelli, F., Fonti, R., Papaccioli, A., Sommella, J., Lettieri, A., Pirozzi, G., Bianco, R., Tortora, G., Salvatore, M., Del Vecchio, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0374</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gefitinib Induction of In vivo Detectable Signals by Bcl-2/Bcl-xL Modulation of Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor Type 3]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Effect of Epithelial and Stromal Lymphocyte Infiltration in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> The major value of prognostic markers in potentially curable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be to guide therapy after surgical resection. In this regard, the patients' immune status at the time of resection may be important and also measurable. The immune system has paradoxical roles during cancer development. However, the prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is controversial. The aim of this study is to elucidate the prognostic significance of epithelial and stromal lymphocyte infiltration in NSCLC.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Tissue microarrays from 335 resected NSCLC, stage I to IIIA were constructed from duplicate cores of viable and representative neoplastic epithelial and stromal areas. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the epithelial and stromal CD4<sup>+</sup>, CD8<sup>+</sup>, and CD20<sup>+</sup> lymphocytes.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In univariate analyses, increasing numbers of epithelial CD8<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> = 0.023), stromal CD8<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> = 0.002), epithelial CD20<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> = 0.023), stromal CD20<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), and stromal CD4<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) lymphocytes correlated significantly with an improved disease-specific survival. No such relation was noted for epithelial CD4<sup>+</sup> cells. Furthermore, a low level of stromal CD8<sup>+</sup> lymphocyte infiltration was associated with an increased incidence of angiolymphatic invasion (<I>P</I> = 0.032). In multivariate analyses, a high number of stromal CD8<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> = 0.043) and CD4<sup>+</sup> (<I>P</I> = 0.002) cells were independent positive prognostic factors for disease-specific survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> High densities of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> lymphocytes in the stroma are independent positive prognostic indicators for resected NSCLC patients. This may suggest that these cells are mediating a strong antitumor immune response in NSCLC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Shibli, K. I., Donnem, T., Al-Saad, S., Persson, M., Bremnes, R. M., Busund, L.-T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Effect of Epithelial and Stromal Lymphocyte Infiltration in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Expression of ER{beta}1, ER{beta}2, and ER{beta}5 Identifies Distinct Prognostic Outcome for Breast Cancer Patients]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Previous conflicting results about the prognostic significance of estrogen receptor (ER)-&beta; in breast cancer may be explained by contribution of isoforms, of which five exist. Our aim was to elucidate the prognostic significance of ER&beta;1, ER&beta;2, and ER&beta;5 by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of breast carcinomas with long-term follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Tissue microarrays were stained with ER&beta;1, ER&beta;2, and ER&beta;5 antibodies and scored as percentage of positive tumor cells and using the Allred system. Nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was evaluated and correlated with histopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Nuclear ER&beta;2 and ER&beta;5, but not ER&beta;1, significantly correlated with OS (<I>P</I> = 0.006, <I>P</I> = 0.039, and <I>P</I> = 0.099, respectively), and ER&beta;2 additionally with DFS (<I>P</I> = 0.013). ER&beta;2 also predicted response to endocrine therapy (<I>P</I> = 0.036); correlated positively with ER, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, and BRCA1; and correlated inversely with metastasis and vascular invasion. Tumors coexpressing ER&beta;2 and ER had better OS and DFS. Cytoplasmic ER&beta;2 expression, alone or combined with nuclear staining, predicted significantly worse OS. Notably, patients with only cytoplasmic ER&beta;2 expression had significantly worse outcome (<I>P</I> = 0.0014).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study elucidating the prognostic role of ER&beta;1, ER&beta;2, and ER&beta;5 in a large breast cancer series. ER&beta;2 is a powerful prognostic indicator in breast cancer, but nuclear and cytoplasmic expression differentially affect outcome. Measuring these in clinical breast cancer could provide a more comprehensive picture of patient outcome, complementing ER.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaaban, A. M., Green, A. R., Karthik, S., Alizadeh, Y., Hughes, T. A., Harkins, L., Ellis, I. O., Robertson, J. F., Paish, E. C., Saunders, P. T.K., Groome, N. P., Speirs, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4528</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Expression of ER{beta}1, ER{beta}2, and ER{beta}5 Identifies Distinct Prognostic Outcome for Breast Cancer Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5236?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5236?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Previous research has shown that the intertumoral maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<SUB>Max</SUB>) of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)&ndash;positron emission tomography (PET) for cervical cancer predicts disease outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pretreatment intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity of FDG.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> This is a prospective cohort study of 72 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages Ib1 to IVa cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation. Three-dimensional FDG-PET threshold tumor volumes were calculated using image segmentation and an adaptive thresholding method for the primary cervix tumor from the pretreatment FDG-PET/computerized tomography. Intratumor heterogeneity was obtained for each patient's cervical tumor by taking the derivative (d<I>V</I>/d<I>T</I>) of the volume-threshold function from 40% to 80%. The association between intratumoral heterogeneity and tumor-specific factors and patient outcomes were determined.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The mean cervix tumor SUV<SUB>Max</SUB> was 12.4 (range, 3.0-38.4). The mean differential tumor heterogeneity was &ndash;1.074 (range, &ndash;0.107 to &ndash;5.623). There was no association between d<I>V</I>/d<I>T</I> and SUV<SUB>Max</SUB> (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup> = 0.069), but there was a relationship with d<I>V</I>/d<I>T</I> and tumor volume (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup> = 0.881). There was no correlation of d<I>V</I>/d<I>T</I> with tumor histology (<I>P</I> = 0.4905). Heterogeneity was significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis at diagnosis (<I>P</I> = 0.0009), tumor response to radiation as evaluated by FDG-PET obtained 3 months after completing treatment (<I>P</I> = 0.0207), risk of pelvic recurrence (<I>P</I> = 0.0017), and progression-free survival (<I>P</I> = 0.03).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Cervical intratumoral FDG metabolic heterogeneity on the pretreatment FDG-PET predicts risk of lymph node involvement at diagnosis, response to therapy, and risk of pelvic recurrence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kidd, E. A., Grigsby, P. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CTLA-4 Blockade Confers Lymphocyte Resistance to Regulatory T-Cells in Advanced Melanoma: Surrogate Marker of Efficacy of Tremelimumab?]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Anti&ndash;CTL antigen-4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has led to encouraging antitumor activity associated with immune-related adverse events in patients with heavily pretreated melanoma. However, mechanisms of action and surrogate immunologic markers of efficacy have not been reported thus far.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We monitored the immune responses of 10 melanoma patients included in a phase II clinical trial, which evaluated the efficacy of a second line of therapy of tremelimumab anti&ndash;CTLA-4 mAb in patients with metastatic melanoma. The frequency of blood leukocyte populations in association with T cell and regulatory T cell (T<SUB>reg</SUB>) functions were evaluated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Prior to therapy, patients with advanced melanoma presented with a severe CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell lymphopenia associated with blunted T-cell proliferative capacities that could be assigned to T<SUB>reg</SUB>. Tremelimumab rapidly restored the effector and memory CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell pool and TCR-dependent T-cell proliferation that became entirely resistant to T<SUB>reg</SUB>-mediated suppression. Progression-free survival and overall survival was directly correlated with the acquisition of a biological response defined as the resistance of peripheral lymphocytes to T<SUB>reg</SUB>-inhibitory effects (obtained in 7 of 10 patients).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> CTLA-4 blockade seems to be a valuable strategy to revive reactive memory T cells anergized in the context of stage IV melanoma, and our work suggests that memory T-cell resistance to T<SUB>reg</SUB> resulting from anti&ndash;CTLA-4 treatment might be a biological activity marker for tremelimumab in patients with melanoma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menard, C., Ghiringhelli, F., Roux, S., Chaput, N., Mateus, C., Grohmann, U., Caillat-Zucman, S., Zitvogel, L., Robert, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4797</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CTLA-4 Blockade Confers Lymphocyte Resistance to Regulatory T-Cells in Advanced Melanoma: Surrogate Marker of Efficacy of Tremelimumab?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Combination Therapy with S-1 and Irinotecan for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 3505]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy with the oral fluoropyrimidine formulation S-1 and irinotecan for patients with advanced NSCLC.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with i.v. irinotecan (150 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) on day 1 and with oral S-1 (80 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-six patients (median age, 63 years; range, 40-74 years) received a total of 286 treatment cycles (median, 5; range, 1-15). No complete responses and 16 partial responses were observed, giving an overall response rate of 28.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 17.3-42.2%]. Twenty-four patients (42.9%) had stable disease and 12 patients (21.4%) had progressive disease as the best response. The overall disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was thus 71.4% (95% CI, 57.8-82.7%). Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.4 months), whereas median overall survival was 15 months. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (3.6%), and anemia (3.6%), with febrile neutropenia being observed in four patients (7.1%). The most common nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included anorexia (14.3%), fatigue (8.9%), and diarrhea (8.9%). There were no deaths attributed to treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The combination of S-1 and irinotecan is a potential alternative option with a favorable toxicity profile for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This nonplatinum regimen warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okamoto, I., Nishimura, T., Miyazaki, M., Yoshioka, H., Kubo, A., Takeda, K., Ebi, N., Sugawara, S., Katakami, N., Fukuoka, M., Nakagawa, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II Study of Combination Therapy with S-1 and Irinotecan for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 3505]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Initial Report of a Radiation Dose-Escalation Trial in Patients with One to Five Sites of Metastatic Disease]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Previous investigations have suggested that a subset of patients with metastatic cancer in a limited number of organs may benefit from local treatment. We investigated whether cancer patients with limited sites of metastatic disease (oligometastasis) who failed standard therapies could be identified and safely treated at one to five known sites of low-volume disease with radiotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Patients with one to five sites of metastatic cancer with a life expectancy of &gt;3 months and good performance status received escalating doses of radiation to all known sites of cancer with hypofractionated radiation therapy. Patients were followed radiographically with computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and metabolically with [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography 1 month following treatment and then every 3 months. Acute toxicities were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and late toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity scoring system.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine patients with 56 metastatic lesions were enrolled from November 2004 to March 2007, with a median follow-up of 14.9 months. Two patients experienced acute (radiation pneumonitis and nausea) and one experienced chronic (gastrointestinal hemorrhage) grade &ge;3 toxicity. Fifty-nine percent of patients responded to protocol therapy. Twenty-one percent of patients have not progressed following protocol treatment. Fifty-seven percent of treated lesions have not progressed at last follow-up. Progression was amenable to further local therapy in 48% of patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with low-volume metastatic cancer can be identified, safely treated, and may benefit from radiotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salama, J. K., Chmura, S. J., Mehta, N., Yenice, K. M., Stadler, W. M., Vokes, E. E., Haraf, D. J., Hellman, S., Weichselbaum, R. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0358</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Initial Report of a Radiation Dose-Escalation Trial in Patients with One to Five Sites of Metastatic Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[C19orf48 Encodes a Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Recognized by CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells from Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Tumor regression has been observed in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Cellular and molecular characterization of antigens recognized by tumor-reactive T cells isolated from responding patients could potentially provide insight into the mechanisms of tumor regression.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> CD8<sup>+</sup> CTL clones that recognized a novel RCC-associated minor histocompatibility (H) antigen presented by HLA-A*0201 were isolated from two patients with metastatic RCC who experienced tumor regression or stable disease following nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT. These clones were used to screen a cDNA library and isolate the unique cDNA encoding the antigen.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> An alternative open reading frame in the <I>C19orf48</I> gene located on chromosome 19q13 encodes the HLA-A*0201&ndash;restricted minor H antigen recognized by the RCC-reactive T cells. The differential T-cell recognition of donor- and recipient-derived target cells is attributable to a nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism within the nucleotide interval that encodes the antigenic peptide. Assays for gene expression and CTL recognition showed that the <I>C19orf48</I>-encoded peptide is widely expressed in renal tumors and solid tumors of other histologies. The antigenic peptide can be processed for CTL recognition via both TAP-dependent and TAP-independent pathways.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Donor T-cell responses against the HLA-A*0201&ndash;restricted minor H antigen encoded by <I>C19orf48</I> may contribute to RCC regression after MHC-matched allogeneic HCT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tykodi, S. S., Fujii, N., Vigneron, N., Lu, S. M., Mito, J. K., Miranda, M. X., Chou, J., Voong, L. N., Thompson, J. A., Sandmaier, B. M., Cresswell, P., Van den Eynde, B., Riddell, S. R., Warren, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[C19orf48 Encodes a Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Recognized by CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells from Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phenotype and Functional Characterization of Long-term gp100-Specific Memory CD8+ T Cells in Disease-Free Melanoma Patients Before and After Boosting Immunization]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Effective cancer vaccines must both drive a strong CTL response and sustain long-term memory T cells capable of rapid recall responses to tumor antigens. We sought to characterize the phenotype and function of gp100 peptide-specific memory CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells in melanoma patients after primary gp100<SUB>209-2M</SUB> immunization and assess the anamnestic response to boosting immunization.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Eight-color flow cytometry analysis of gp100-specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells was done on peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected shortly after the primary vaccine regimen, 12 to 24 months after primary vaccination, and after boosting immunization. The anamnestic response was assessed by comparing the frequency of circulating gp100-specific T cells before and after boosting. Gp100 peptide-induced <I>in vitro</I> functional avidity and proliferation responses and melanoma-stimulated T-cell CD107 mobilization were compared for cells from all three time points for multiple patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The frequency of circulating gp100-specific memory CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells was comparable with cytomegalovirus-specific and FLU-specific T cells in the same patients, and the cells exhibited anamnestic proliferation after boosting. Their phenotypes were not unique, and individual patients exhibited one of two distinct phenotype signatures that were homologous to either cytomegalovirus-specific or FLU-specific memory T cells. Gp100-specific memory T cells showed some properties of competent memory T cells, such as heightened <I>in vitro</I> peptide-stimulated proliferation and increase in central memory (T<SUB>CM</SUB>) differentiation when compared with T-cell responses measured after the primary vaccine regimen. However, they did not acquire enhanced functional avidity usually associated with competent memory T-cell maturation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Although vaccination with class I&ndash;restricted melanoma peptides alone can break tolerance to self-tumor antigens, it did not induce fully competent memory CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells&mdash;even in disease-free patients. Data presented suggest other vaccine strategies will be required to induce functionally robust long-term memory T cells.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, E. B., Haley, D., Petrausch, U., Floyd, K., Miller, W., Sanjuan, N., Alvord, G., Fox, B. A., Urba, W. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phenotype and Functional Characterization of Long-term gp100-Specific Memory CD8+ T Cells in Disease-Free Melanoma Patients Before and After Boosting Immunization]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and Immunologic Response of a Viral Vaccine to Prostate-Specific Antigen in Combination with Radiation Therapy when Metronomic-Dose Interleukin 2 Is Used as an Adjuvant]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> We have previously reported on the safety and immunologic response of a poxvirus-based vaccine encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) used in combination with radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. We hypothesized that a "metronomic" dose of interleukin 2 (IL-2) as a biological adjuvant would cause less toxicity while maintaining immunologic response.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> Eighteen patients with localized prostate cancer were treated in a single-arm trial using previously established doses of vaccine and radiation therapy. The vaccine used was a recombinant vaccinia virus engineered to encode PSA admixed with a recombinant vaccinia encoding the costimulatory molecule B7.1, followed by booster vaccinations with a recombinant fowlpox vector expressing PSA. Patients received a total of eight planned vaccination cycles, once every 4 weeks, with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given on days 1 to 4 and interleukin 2 (IL-2) at a dose of 0.6 MIU/M<sup>2</sup> given from days 8 to 21 after each vaccination. Definitive external beam radiation therapy was initiated after the third vaccination cycle. Patients were evaluated for safety and immunologic response. Toxicity and immunologic activity were compared with the previously reported regimen containing a higher dose of IL-2.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventeen of 18 patients received all eight cycles of vaccine with IL-2. Five of eight HLA-A2<sup>+</sup> patients evaluated had an increase in PSA-specific T cells of &ge;3-fold. Toxicities were generally mild, with only seven vaccination cycles of 140 given resulting in grade 3 toxicities possibly attributable to IL-2.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Metronomic-dose IL-2 in combination with vaccine and radiation therapy is safe, can induce prostate-specific immune responses, and has immunologic activity similar to low-dose IL-2, with markedly reduced toxicities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lechleider, R. J., Arlen, P. M., Tsang, K.-Y., Steinberg, S. M., Yokokawa, J., Cereda, V., Camphausen, K., Schlom, J., Dahut, W. L., Gulley, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and Immunologic Response of a Viral Vaccine to Prostate-Specific Antigen in Combination with Radiation Therapy when Metronomic-Dose Interleukin 2 Is Used as an Adjuvant]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5292?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical and Immunologic Results of a Phase II Trial of Sequential Imiquimod and Photodynamic Therapy for Vulval Intraepithelial Neoplasia]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5292?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is difficult to treat by excision or ablation because of high recurrence rates. Small studies of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and imiquimod treatments have shown some success and function at least in part through stimulation of local immune responses. Indeed, there is evidence that immunosuppressed individuals have higher rates of VIN, suggesting immune control is relevant.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> In the study, 20 women with high-grade VIN were treated with topical imiquimod and the PDT sequentially. Vulval biopsy and blood were taken pretreatment and, after imiquimod and PDT, with follow up for 1 year. Clinical response was assessed by measuring lesion size. Biopsies were analyzed for HPV DNA and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes including T regulatory cells.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The treatment was well-tolerated. There was an overall response rate of 55% by intention treat and 64% per protocol. The 52-week symptom response was 65% asymptomatic, compared with 5% at baseline. The nonresponders showed a significantly higher level of T regulatory cells in the lesions after imiquimod treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The response rates are clinically relevant, and the treatment regimen was feasible for the majority. Initial nonresponders to imiquimod seem to be relatively refractory, and this may derive from their unfavorable local immune environment, in particular, the increased proportions of T regulatory cells, possibly the limiting action and/or development of any HPV T-cell immunity. The potential benefit of this treatment is its ability to treat multifocal disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winters, U., Daayana, S., Lear, J. T., Tomlinson, A. E., Elkord, E., Stern, P. L., Kitchener, H. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4760</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical and Immunologic Results of a Phase II Trial of Sequential Imiquimod and Photodynamic Therapy for Vulval Intraepithelial Neoplasia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5300?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Competing Risks of Causes of Death and their Variation Over Different Time Periods in Hodgkin's Disease]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5300?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> Hodgkin's disease is considered a model of curable illness. However, long-term studies show excessive mortality in relation to the general population. We studied the various causes of death by use of competing risks and their evolution over the years.</p>
<p><b>Experimental Design:</b> All patients diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease at our institution between 1967 and 2003 were included. The competing risks of causes of death and their vital situation were examined in three time periods: cohort A with patients treated before 1980, cohort B with patients treated from 1981 to 1986, and cohort C with patients treated from 1986 onwards.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We studied 534 patients, with a median follow-up time of 9.1 years for the whole cohort. The 5-year, 15-year, and 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for all patients were 81%, 72%, and 65%, respectively. At the close of the study, 337 (63.1%) were alive and 170 (31.8%) patients had died. The most common cause of death was the progression of Hodgkin's disease, followed by deaths due to a second tumor. Survival was significantly worse in the first period than in the other two (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), and in the three periods, the main cause of death was tumor progression.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The progression of Hodgkin's disease is the main cause of death. Over time, a reduction in death related to infection and the acute toxicity of treatment was seen. A lot of patients still die for reasons linked to delayed side effects of radiotherapy, such as second tumors and heart disease, which is important to plan preventive activities and clinical research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Provencio, M., Millan, I., Espana, P., Sanchez, A. C., Sanchez, J. J., Cantos, B., Vargas, J. A., Bellas, C., Garcia, V., Sabin, P., Bonilla, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0927</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Competing Risks of Causes of Death and their Variation Over Different Time Periods in Hodgkin's Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cancer Therapy: Clinical</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytoplasmic MUC1 in PanIN-1]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bara, J., Forgue-Lafitte, M.-E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytoplasmic MUC1 in PanIN-1]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Bara, et al]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5306-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gold, D. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Bara, et al]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Article on Diagnostic Markers for Ovarian Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-16-COR1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Article on Diagnostic Markers for Ovarian Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Article on Impact of Angiogenesis Inhibition by Sunitinib on Tumor Distribution of Temozolomide]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/16/5308-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-16-COR2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Article on Impact of Angiogenesis Inhibition by Sunitinib on Tumor Distribution of Temozolomide]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>16</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing CCR Translations]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arteaga, C. L., Ritz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-15-ED</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing CCR Translations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4681</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editors' Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moving Toward Individualized Cancer Therapies]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>In vivo</I> analysis of the gene expression profiles of cancer cells before and after treatment in patients may define mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to specific drugs and ultimately allow for the selection of optimal individualized therapy to improve outcome in cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tonon, G., Anderson, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moving Toward Individualized Cancer Therapies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4684</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CCR Translations</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4685?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Use in Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/14/15/4685?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) used for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients have been associated with adverse outcomes of enhanced tumor progression and impaired survival in a series of recent clinical trials. As clinical practice guidelines for ESA administration in cancer patients have evolved to improve safety, the mechanisms underlying the adverse outcomes and whether ESAs exert direct and/or indirect effects in primary tumors to modulate tumor cell growth, survival, and chemoradiotherapy responses remain uncertain. Erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) expression in tumor cells has raised the simplistic possibility that Epo signaling mediated via a functional cellular receptor may contribute to tumor progression in a direct manner. However, Epo biology in cancer is likely to be complex and an interplay of multiple factors is potent