Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 14, 4368-4371, July 15, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0325
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freidlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freidlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A.

Statistics in Clinical Cancer Research

Multi-Arm Clinical Trials of New Agents: Some Design Considerations

Boris Freidlin1, Edward L. Korn1, Robert Gray2 and Alison Martin1

Authors' Affiliations:1 Biometric Research Branch and Clinical Investigations Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Boris Freidlin, Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-402-0640; Fax: 301-402-0560; E-mail: freidlinb{at}ctep.nci.nih.gov.

Abstract

A major challenge in the development of anticancer therapies is the considerable time and resources needed for conducting randomized clinical trials (RCT). There is a need for more efficient RCT designs that accelerate development, minimize costs, and make trials more appealing to patients. We review the statistical and logistical characteristics of multi-arm designs that compare several experimental treatments to a common control arm. In particular, we present a rationale for not requiring multiplicity adjustment in multi-arm trials that are designed for logistical efficiency. Relative to conducting separate RCTs for each experimental agent, this multi-arm design is shown to require a lower total sample size than multiple two-arm trials.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.