
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Statistics in Clinical Cancer Research |
Authors' Affiliations:1 Biometric Research Branch and Clinical Investigations Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Boris Freidlin, Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-402-0640; Fax: 301-402-0560; E-mail: freidlinb{at}ctep.nci.nih.gov.
Abstract
A major challenge in the development of anticancer therapies is the considerable time and resources needed for conducting randomized clinical trials (RCT). There is a need for more efficient RCT designs that accelerate development, minimize costs, and make trials more appealing to patients. We review the statistical and logistical characteristics of multi-arm designs that compare several experimental treatments to a common control arm. In particular, we present a rationale for not requiring multiplicity adjustment in multi-arm trials that are designed for logistical efficiency. Relative to conducting separate RCTs for each experimental agent, this multi-arm design is shown to require a lower total sample size than multiple two-arm trials.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |